INNOVATIVE PATENT & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS
The CFDB Difference
All our lawyers and agents have undergraduate or graduate degrees in science and engineering, including four PhDs. Our staff professionals have decades of experience working on patent and trademark matters. Many have worked in corporate legal departments during their career and understand the business implications of the patent and intellectual property work we do for you.
Why Choose CFDB?
The reason is simple: We have built a global reputation for providing creative, effective solutions to clients filing new patents, protecting existing patents, managing copyright and IP portfolios, and all of their other intellectual property issues, opportunities, and concerns that businesses and individuals face today.
Innovative Solutions For All Areas Of Intellectual Property
- U.S. and international patent preparation and prosecution
- Patent opinions
- Post-grant patent proceedings
- Due diligence and portfolio management
- Copyright registration
- Intellectual property licensing
- Intellectual property litigation
We represent clients before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as well as in federal court.
Our combined team has decades of experience preparing and filing patent and trademark applications in foreign countries. Through an established network, we have trusted and longstanding relationships with the best intellectual property law firms in numerous countries throughout the world who are well-versed in intellectual property laws and practices in Europe and Asia.
Our team of carefully selected attorneys and staff are committed to providing you with thoughtful, strategic, practical and effective advice. In addition to being knowledgeable in all areas of intellectual property law, most of our attorneys have earned advanced degrees, enabling them to quickly grasp complicated technological ideas, and guide our clients’ intellectual property strategies.
Said to Doug Christensen on a phone call with a CEO of a soon to be a NASDAQ listed corporation after the three arbitrator panel released a “no infringement finding” of the client’s product following a two week arbitration first chaired by Doug Christensen.